Which of the following is an acceptable format for communicating FUEL STATE?

When communicating fuel state, it's important to represent the information clearly and in a format that can be understood without ambiguity. Both indicated formats are valid because they convey pertinent information regarding the aircraft's fuel situation.

When using the format of weight, such as "FUEL STATE 3000 pounds," it provides a precise measurement of the amount of fuel onboard. This specifics help ground personnel and other aircrew understand the exact quantity of fuel available for flight operations.

The alternative format, "FUEL STATE 60 minutes," communicates the fuel state based on endurance, which refers to how long the aircraft can continue flying with the remaining fuel. This format is useful for operational planning and situational awareness, as it gives an indication of how much longer the aircraft can remain airborne before fuel exhaustion.

The other option, "FUEL STATE high," is less precise compared to the first two formats, as it does not provide specific quantitative data that can be easily interpreted or utilized in planning. Therefore, the combination of both weight and endurance formats provides comprehensive and actionable information about the fuel state of the aircraft, justifying that both formats are acceptable in communication of fuel state.